Resources and capital of different social classes in modern Latvia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i3.861Keywords:
Latvia, Social classes, “Resource portfolio”, Total capital, Degree of the resource capitalization, Lower working class, Middle classAbstract
This study aims to analyze the resources and capital of modern Latvia’s social classes located close to the opposite poles of social structure. The article intends to address two research tasks: (1) checking the possibility of identifying social classes in modern Latvia; (2) searching for differences in resources and capital between the identified social classes. The study is based conceptually on the multi-criteria theory of social classes and the conception of ‘ideal types’ as well as on the theory of capital and the innovative resource-based approach. The article presents results of the survey conducted in Latvia (2019, n = 798). Research results show that ‘ideal types’ of the working class and the middle class, identified by two objective (income and education) and one subjective (self-identification) criteria, together form only 9% of modern Latvia’s society. These social classes differ among themselves not so much by the amount of resources as by the amount of capital, meaning that the working class in Latvia is less able to capitalize resources.
References
Aasland, A., & Fløtten, T. (2001). Ethnicity and social exclusion in Estonia and Latvia. Europe-Asia Studies, 53(7), 1023-1049, http://www.jstor.org/stable/826405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130120085029
Andriushyna, L., Trynyak, M., Kakovkina, O., & Shuba, V. (2020). Mindset as a value-related and conceptual factor of economic development of post-colonial states. Economic Annals XXI, 184(7-8), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V184-08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V184-08
Bird, R., & Newport, F. (2017). What determines how Americans perceive their social class? Polling Matters. https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/204497/determines-americans-perceive-social-class.aspx
Boronenko, V., & Drezgic, S. (2014). Economic determinants of territory competitiveness and development sustainability. Socialo zinatnu vestnesis=Social Sciences Bulletin, 19(2), 44-67. https://old.du.lv/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/SZF_vestnesis_2014_2.pdf
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The Social Structures of the Economy. Wiley.
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2020a). Population by regions. Statistical Database. http://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__POP__IR__IRD/IRD010/
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2020b). Population by ethnicity in regions, cities, municipalities and 21 development centres at the beginning of the year 2011 – 2021. Statistical Database. https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/en/OSP_PUB/START__POP__IR__IRE/IRE030/
Dahrendorf, R. (1994). Elementy teorii sotsial’nogo konflikta [Elements of the theory of social conflict]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia = Sociological Research, 5, 142-147. http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/968/645/1216/019_darendorf.pdf. (in Russian)
Daugavpils University. (2019). Resources of Latgale Region’s Population. Dataset of the sociological survey, Latgale region (Latvia), n = 798 respondents, questionnaire and SPSS database. Available by request: vera.komarova@du.lv
Florida, R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class, and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
Jackson, M.V., & Evans, G. (2017). Rebuilding walls: market transition and social mobility in the post-socialist societies of Europe. Sociological Science, 4, 54-79. https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a3
Johnson, A.G. (2000). "Ideal Type". The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology. Wiley-Blackwell.
Kim, J.-W., Lim, Ch., & Falci, Ch. (2020). Subjective social class, perceived quality of social relationships, and happiness: A case of mediation and moderation across gender. International Sociology, 35, 312-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920906375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920906375
Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Lakis, P. (1994). Latvijas sabiedribas sociala stratifikacijas 1990. gadu sakuma [Social stratification of Latvia’s society in early 1990s]. LZA Vestnesis = Bulletin of Latvia’s Academy of Sciences, A(4), 8-13. (in Latvian)
Manstead, A.S.R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
Menshikov, V. (2011). Human capital in the structure of total capital of personality: sociological aspect. Filosofija. Sociologija = Philosophy. Sociology, 22, 150-161. http://mokslozurnalai.lmaleidykla.lt/publ/0235-7186/2011/2/149-160.pdf
Menshikov, V. (2016). Experience of research of social classes in Latvia. Filosofija. Sociologija = Philosophy. Sociology, 27, 83-93. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Experience-of-research-of-social-classes-in-Latvia-Menshikov/222348877a4d6162d1952dc5a97a625de378e86f
Mensikovs, V., Kokina, I., Komarova, V., Ruza, O., & Danilevica, A. (2020). Measuring multidimensional poverty within the resource-based approach: a case study of Latgale region, Latvia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 1211-1227. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(72) DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(72)
Parsons, T. (2010). Essays in Sociological Theory. Simon and Schuster.
Parsons, T., & Shils, E.A. (2013). Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard university press.
Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, A. (2013). A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC’s Great British class survey experiment. Sociology, 47(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128
Seda, F.S.S.E., Setyawati, L., Pera, Y.H.T., Damm, M.R., & Nobel, K. (2020). Social exclusion, religious capital, and the quality of life: Multiple case studies of Indonesia and Thailand. Economics and Sociology, 13, 107-124. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-4/7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-4/7
Shmoller, G. (1906). Bor’ba klassov i klassovoe gospodstvo [Class Struggle and Class Dominance]. ?oscow. (in Russian)
Sorokin, P.A. (2007). Sotsial’naia stratifikatsiia i mobil’nost’ [Social Stratification and Mobility]. Moscow: Direct-Media. (in Russian)
Swedberg, R. (2018). How to use Max Weber’s ideal type in sociological analysis. Journal of Classical Sociology, 3(18), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17743643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17743643
Thaning, M. (2021). Resource specificity in intergenerational inequality: The case of education, occupation, and income. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 75, 100644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100644
Tikhonova, N.E. (2006). Resursnyi podkhod kak novaia teoreticheskaia paradigma v stratifikatsionnykh issledovaniiakh [Resource approach as a new theoretical paradigm in stratification studies]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia = Sociological Research, 9, 28-41. (in Russian)
Wong, S. (2011) Sotsial’naia struktura kitaiskogo obshchestva: dinamika stratifikatsionnykh protsessov [The social structure of Chinese society: Stratification dynamics]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov=RUDN Journal of Sociology, 4, 61-70. http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/6187. (in Russian)
Wright, E. O. (2000). Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. New York: Cambridge university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488917
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.
